|
Declaration on Endogenous Development and Biocultural Diversity
Lezajsk,
Poland 27 September 2006
We, the members of the
Compas network, who are the representatives of different community based
organisations, NGOs, universities and peoples, with different cultural
backgrounds from Latin America, Africa, Asia, Europe, gathered at the Compas
partner meeting in Lezajsk, Poland, September 2006, have agreed on the
following:
| 1. |
For the last ten years
we have been working to maintain and enhance bio-cultural diversity by
supporting Endogenous Development. This is development based mainly, but
not exclusively, on locally available resources, values and knowledge.
We are developing mechanisms for local learning and experimenting, for
building local economies and for retaining benefits in the local area.
We are determined to further contribute to efforts which enhance
Endogenous Development and bio-cultural diversity, by:
-
supporting local
communities;
-
co-operating as
partners in the Compas programme;
-
collaborating with
other CBOs, NGOs, universities and governmental and international
agencies that support Endogenous Development and bio-cultural
diversity.
|
| 2. |
We recognise that there
are important and valuable initiatives for bio-cultural diversity:
national and international policies and conventions, initiatives by
grass root organisations and social movements. Yet, not enough is being
done to prevent further erosion and destruction of bio-cultural
diversity. We are concerned about the global environmental, social,
economic and cultural crises as well as the way biological and cultural
diversity is being eroded and destroyed by human activities.
|
| 3. |
We note that the
domination of materialistic and mechanistic worldviews in mainstream
sciences, technology and commercial systems is contributing to the
global crises and the reduction of bio-cultural diversity. We therefore
draw attention to worldviews, systems of wisdom and sciences present in
-
the history of humankind, also of
cultures now dominated by materialism;
-
the diverse cultures and sciences
throughout the world;
-
the minds and hearts of people and
social movements;
-
feminine perspectives on life;
-
recent scientific developments such as
trans-disciplinarity and new trends in quantum physics.
|
| 4. |
We reject:
-
The growing levels of
material, social and spiritual poverty in all parts of the globe.
-
The loss of
territorial and food sovereignty, as well as the destruction of
ecology and livelihood systems.
-
The global
geo-political, socio-cultural and economic power strategies and the
expansion of the global market economy, with its destruction of
biological and cultural diversity.
-
The loss of social
cohesion, solidarity, reciprocity and mutual help in rural and urban
communities.
-
The negative effects
of globalisation, the market economy, and commoditisation of life,
water, genetic resources, and the knowledges and wisdoms of
traditional and indigenous people.
-
The loss of spiritual
values and practices. The reduction of the role of spirituality in
giving sense and direction to people.
-
The imposition of
dominant values, religions and belief systems on diverse cultures and
peoples.
-
The lack of respect
for and communication between different religions and spiritual
traditions, and the related increase of tensions and aggression.
-
The dominance of
mainstream science as well as the marginalisation and underestimation
of traditional and indigenous sciences.
-
The imbalance in
credibility, prestige, power and access to resources between
mainstream and traditional knowledges and sciences.
-
The global and
national policies that promote and generate the erosion of
biodiversity, knowledges and wisdoms of traditional and indigenous
peoples in the fields of agriculture, health and conservation of
nature.
-
The erosion and/or
substitution of: roles and functions of traditional institutions;
systems of governance for managing ecosystems and social organisation
of traditional and indigenous communities.
-
The dominating role
of materialistic and mechanistic worldviews, as well as the global
spread of these in policies for development, commercial activities and
sciences, and their impact on bio-cultural diversity.
-
The lack of
recognition of and regard for the collective rights of traditional and
indigenous peoples, and the imposition of laws of intellectual
property rights and free trade agreements upon these groups.
-
All forms of
intellectual property rights on living beings.
-
The production of genetically modified
organisms which is taking place: predominantly driven by commercial
interests of transnational corporations, with insufficient attention
to environmental and bio-safety aspects, and the lack of transparency
in the processes of decision making. We reject the negative impact
that the production of GMOs has on farmers’ autonomy.
|
| 5. |
We call
on scientists, educators, policy makers and corporate organisations to
be fully aware of the consequences of the proliferation and domination
of materialistic, and commercial values and practices. We invite
initiatives from these, and from all parts of civil society, to enhance
and respect endogenous innovations and recognise collective rights.
|
| 6. |
We
acknowledge that local knowledges, sciences and wisdom of traditional
and indigenous peoples may have their specific strengths as well as
weaknesses. We also affirm that mainstream science also has its own
strengths and weaknesses. Hence, activities are required to build on the
strengths and reduce the limitations of both. |
| 7. |
Intra-cultural and inter-cultural processes of learning and research
should be strengthened and collective rights acknowledged. |
| |
|
We
recommend
For Policy |
| 1. |
That the international
and national bodies, concerned with development policies, incorporate
programmes and projects that defend collective rights, support the
revaluation and revitalisation of wisdoms and ways of knowing of
traditional and indigenous peoples, and the non-commodification of local
knowledges and natural resources. |
| 2. |
That
national governments respect and acknowledge traditional institutions
and organisational systems. |
| 3. |
That
global and national policies strengthen local economic systems, giving
priority to local production and marketing, sovereignty and safety of
food. |
| 4. |
An
increase in the allocation of resources for research and development of
knowledges and sciences of traditional and indigenous peoples.
|
| 5. |
Training for scholars and professionals who are committed to the values
and principles of traditional and indigenous peoples to:
-
Develop, update and
improve their theories and practices;
-
Set standards for
students and professionals;
-
Evaluate mainstream
knowledge and practices from traditional perspectives;
-
Enrich the
foundations of their own sciences.
|
| 6. |
An
increase in intra- and inter-scientific cooperation for mutual learning
and co-evolution of mainstream and local sciences (e.g. in health and
agriculture), as well as the interaction between folk, classical and
mainstream practitioners. Enhancing the symmetry in power position and
resource access for both types of sciences. |
| 7. |
Acknowledgement of and respect for the views of territory possessed by
peoples and communities. |
| 8. |
Acknowledgement of and support for cultures, nations and traditional and
indigenous peoples to protect their systems of health and medicinal
resources, including their physical, spiritual, mental and social
aspects. |
| |
|
|
For
Research |
| 1. |
Recognition of the collective nature of traditional knowledge.
|
| 2. |
Mainstream scientists and thinkers take into account traditional and
indigenous knowledges, sciences and wisdoms as valuable sources. |
| 3. |
The
establishment of an international research centre and/or an alliance for
Endogenous Development and biocultural diversity. |
| 4. |
Support for local
experts to assess, understand, document and disseminate information on:
-
Indigenous plants,
crops, animals as well as local knowledge, values and land-use
systems;
-
Indigenous
institutions and effective practices in community organisational
development;
-
Local and indigenous
concepts of territory and the existing threats and opportunities for
people’s territorial sovereignty;
-
Gender perspectives
on bio-cultural diversity in different cultures;
-
Collective rights and
ways to protect these.
|
| 5. |
That
carriers of local knowledge and wisdom are supported in their own
research and dissemination of the outcomes, and are acknowledged as
researchers in their own right. |
| |
|
|
For
Education |
| 1. |
That primary, secondary
and higher education curricula include traditional sciences and
technologies in their theories, methods and practices. |
| 2. |
Support
of informal and non-formal education focusing on Endogenous Development
and bio-cultural diversity. |
| 3. |
That
self-confidence and pride in local culture and traditional professions
be reinforced and strengthened. |
| 4. |
Share
information with farmers and communities on bio-safety and land-use
rights, cultural rights, ownership of knowledge and commodities. |
| 5. |
Incorporation of local experts as teachers in schools and in research. |
| |
|
|
For
Activities and Initiatives |
| 1. |
Develop
methodologies for working with indigenous and traditional institutions. |
| 2. |
That in
engaging with communities, outside agents identify and work with
existing institutions rather than establish new organisations. |
| 3. |
The
promotion of empowerment of traditional authorities through training,
networking and exchanges. |
| 4. |
The
recognition and use of traditional structures as channels through which
traditional authorities and their communities influence the development
process. |
| 5. |
Initiation and support for policy dialogues amongst stakeholders from
different cultural backgrounds on cultural rights and local management
of natural resources. |
| 6. |
Coordination of initiatives for promoting local resources such as
indigenous seeds and animal breeds in different parts of the world. |
| 7. |
Dominant religions respect local spirituality, religions and belief
systems. |
|